Thursday, 28 April 2016 13:53

Explanation from Michael Russell about the named person.

Written by

The issue of the named person has been raised on a few doorsteps in the last week. This is a result of a campaign being pushed by the Tories which seeks to exploit a current petition to the UK Supreme Court about the matter.

This follows on two court cases in Scotland in which a small number of people (from a Christian fundamentalist background) attempted to have the legislation overturned. The cases were thrown out by Scottish judges in their entirety and we expect the same to happen in the UK Supreme Court.

The key facts about the named person legislation are as follows;

* The legislation does NOT impose a "State Guardian" on every child.

* Most parents and families will never know that there is a "named person" for their children.

* The named person legislation has been operating in pilot areas, including Highland council, for several years and has not resulted in any difficulties regarding confidentiality, intervention or interference.

* The arrangements in the legislation largely formalise existing good practice and are supported by virtually all children's charities, the police, social workers and many others.

* The names person activity is NOT in addition to other duties but merely recognises a role that has been undertaken informally before. For children under school age it is a Health Visitor and for those of school age it is a Head Teacher.

* The legislation gives "named persons" no greater powers than they already have under existing laws but will help the various agencies to work more constructively together and with a lighter touch when it is needed.

Those opposing the legislation consistently misrepresent it. Nothing they have alleged about the legislation in their court case has turned out to be true and all their arguments have lost in court.

The Tories are exploiting the situation and their suggestion that the "named person" arrangements take money away from deprived children is utterly wrong. In addition problems for children don't just take place in "deprived neighbourhoods" as Conservative candidate in Argyll & Bute recently claimed at a Hustings.

The existence of a "named person" is likely to help in rare but important instances and as a result it will help children who might not otherwise get assistance at a crucial time.

Only the Tories opposed the legislation in the Scottish Parliament - all other parties supported it. Labour's present criticism was not made at the time and is further evidence of their opportunism.

I would be happy to discuss this with any activist or voter.

Michael

Support the HSDP

funding

Helensburgh Seafront Development Project is about saving and restoring the pier. It is also about developing the west bay - YOUR SUPPORT IS NEEDED!. There are 2 pdfs you can download from the downloads link above. Or, you can visit the Facebook page of the HSDP

EF Logo 01
Didyou know that whenever you buy anything online – from your weekly shop to your annual holiday – you could be raising a free donation for Helensburgh SNP?
There are nearly 3,000 retailers including Amazon, John Lewis, Aviva, thetrainline and Sainsbury’s, who will donate a percentage of the amount you spend to Helensburgh SNP to say thank you for shopping with them.
It’s really simple, and doesn’t cost you anything. All you have to do to join is: Click Here
easyfundraising LogoWall 500x400 3

     If you would like to support Helensburgh SNP please donate by clicking on the button below

FoodbankFood Needed 9.17